Imagine investing in a smart home gadget, only to have it rendered useless by the manufacturer. That’s exactly what’s happening to Logitech’s $100 Pop smart home buttons on October 15. In a move that’s sure to frustrate early adopters, Logitech has announced it will brick all Pop switches, effectively turning them into expensive paperweights. But here’s where it gets controversial: is this a necessary step in the evolution of technology, or a betrayal of consumer trust? Let’s dive in.
Back in August 2016, Logitech introduced the Pop switches, promising users a seamless way to control their smart home devices. These buttons were designed to simplify life by offering quick access to a variety of actions, from adjusting Philips Hue lighting to playing playlists on Sonos speakers. Each button could store up to three actions, working seamlessly with devices on the same Wi-Fi network. Controlled via a dedicated app for Android or iOS, the Pop Home Switch Starter Pack retailed for $100, with additional switches priced at $40 each. For many, it was a game-changer—until now.
On September 29, Logitech notified customers via email that their Pop switches would become obsolete in just two weeks. The message, shared on platforms like Reddit, was blunt: ‘As of October 15, 2025, your POP button(s) and the connected hub will no longer be supported and will lose all functionality.’ As compensation, Logitech offered a 15% discount coupon for select products, valid only in the U.S. until March 31, 2026. However, the coupon excludes popular items like gaming wheels, videoconferencing gear, and newly released products. Is this enough to make up for the loss? Many would argue no.
And this is the part most people miss: Logitech’s decision highlights a broader issue in the smart home industry—the fragility of devices reliant on cloud services. Once support ends, these gadgets often become e-waste, raising questions about sustainability and consumer rights. Logitech’s spokesperson declined to address concerns about e-waste or whether users could continue using the devices locally after October 15, instead reiterating that the decision was driven by technological evolution.
Logitech’s smart home lineup has long been criticized for lack of updates and innovation. The Pop ecosystem, despite its initial promise, appears to be another casualty of this neglect. But what does this mean for the future of smart home technology? Are we doomed to repeat this cycle of obsolescence, or can manufacturers find a better way to balance innovation with longevity?
Here’s a thought-provoking question for you: Should companies be held accountable for the environmental impact of bricking devices, or is it the consumer’s responsibility to anticipate such outcomes? Let us know your thoughts in the comments. This isn’t just about a $100 button—it’s about the future of technology and our role in shaping it.
